fbpx

As part of Banned Books Week 2021, which ran this year from September 26th through October 2nd, the First Amendment Museum (FAM) considered examples of young adult books that have been banned throughout the United States. This coincided with our September 27th virtual program for teenagers, “You Can’t Read That! Banned Books and Censorship for Teens.”

It is through the controversies and debates surrounding these books that the nature of censorship itself, especially in a country with such strong protections on the freedom of expression through the First Amendment, will be explored. 

Learn more about how books get banned in the United States.

Twilight Series by Stephenie Myer

Twilight book series by Stephenie Meyer

Anybody who came of age during the late 2000s will remember the Twilight craze that swept the world. However, you may be surprised to learn that the Twilight series has been banned or challenged since publication of the eponymous first novel in 2005. The most famous example of banning the series occurred in September 2008, when the Twilight books were temporarily removed from middle school libraries in the Capistrano Unified School District in California for “containing subject matter which is deemed too mature for our middle school-level students.” In an odd turn of events, the district’s instructional materials specialist, the one who had initially banned the series, quickly changed her mind, revoking her previous decision for unknown reasons, and later asked district librarians to “disregard” her initial banned book email.

Harry Potter series by JK Rowling

The Harry Potter series are some of the most banned books of all time and the American Library Association lists them as the most challenged book series of the twenty-first century. The series is predominately challenged for its portrayal of witchcraft and its recurrent dark themes, including death. As late as 2019, 20 years after its original publication in 1999, it remained the ninth most “challenged” book of that year, also according to the American Library Association

The Hunger Games trilogy by Suzanne Collins

The teen dystopian novel fad of the early 2010s did not escape the wrath of censorship. The first book of the Hunger Games trilogy, originally published in 2008, began “catching fire” for its portrayal of young adult violence which resulted in it being the fifth most challenged book of 2010, according to the American Library Association. The trilogy is set in a dystopian future in which children are made to fight to the death on reality television. Suzanne Collins, the author of the Hunger Games, was inspired when she watched a reality game show right after footage of the Iraq war. Interestingly, the series has also been a source of controversy in Thailand. A three-finger salute, used by characters in the novel as a form of defiance, was adopted by Thailand’s anti-government protestors resulting in the salute being banned by the Thai military. One of the film adaptations of the Hunger Games was also banned in Thailand.

All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely

The third most banned book of 2020, according to the American Library Association, was the young adult novel All American Boys. The book is the story of two teenage boys, Rashad Butler and Quinn Collins, as they encounter racism and police brutality while coming of age in modern America. The most dramatic challenge to All American Boys occurred in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, where the law enforcement union argued for the book to be banned from a local high school. The school’s librarian fought for the book to continue being taught and the National Coalition Against Censorship wrote to the principal urging the district not to remove the book from the high school’s curriculum. The school made the decision to keep the book in the curriculum, but it has continued to be challenged by school districts throughout the United States.

The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie

Based upon the real-life experiences of its author Sherman Alexie, the story is about a Native American teenager named Arnold Spirit, Jr., a 14-year-old amateur cartoonist who decides to leave the reservation where he grew up, and attend a nearly all-white public high school. Controversy centers on the book’s depiction of alcohol-use, poverty, bullying, violence, profanity, and homophobic slurs. Since publication in 2008, the book has consistently appeared on the annual list of frequently challenged books from 2010 to 2019 according to the American Library Association.

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee

This book needs no introduction to most Americans, as it has been part of high-school English curriculums for decades. Set in the Deep South of the 1930s, the coming-of-age story is about the protagonist Scout Finch, a young girl who grapples with both racial inequality and growing up. To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the most frequently challenged books in the United States due to its portrayal of rape, use of profanity, and inclusion of racial slurs. In 2017, the novel was removed from middle school classrooms in Biloxi, Mississippi following a complaint from a parent citing the use of racial slurs. After protests from free speech advocates, the novel was added back to a list of optional readings for students. In 2018, it was banned from schools in Duluth, Minnesota due to its use of racial slurs, where it remains banned to this day.

Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain

In 1885, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was banned for the first time just one month after its publication. “Not suitable for trash,” said the outraged librarian in Concord, Massachusetts who banned the book from the town’s library. Set in the Antebellum South, the story is a first-person narrative told by Huckleberry “Huck” Finn who teams up with an escaped enslaved man named Jim, as they float down the Mississippi towards differing versions of freedom. Nearly 140 years later, this novel has been challenged and banned numerous times by parents, school boards, publishers, and librarians, citing use of racial slurs and bigoted language. It is currently ranked number 14 on the top 100 Banned/Challenged books in America.

Check out our Banned Books article from 2020, which focused on Maine authors.

Keep reading...

Renowned professor of the early American republic joins efforts at the First Amendment Museum

The First Amendment Museum (FAM) announces the appointment of Peter S. Onuf, Thomas Jefferson Professor Emeritus at University of Virginia and a specialist in the history of the early American republic to the Museum’s Board of Directors.

Onuf, who retired to Maine several years ago, brings extensive scholarship in American history to the Board of Directors and the new concept museum that inspires people to understand and exercise their First Amendment rights. The FAM is located in the historic capital district of Augusta, ME in the former home of media titan, Guy P. Gannett, and was founded by his granddaughters, Genie Gannett and Terry Gannett Hopkins.

“The First Amendment has never been more important to Americans than it is now,” Onuf said. “I am honored to serve on the board of the First Amendment Museum, a critically important civic resource for our troubled times.”

Onuf was educated at Johns Hopkins University, where he received his A.B. in 1967 and Ph.D. in 1973, and has taught at Columbia University, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, and Southern Methodist University before he arrived in Virginia in 1990.  In 2008-2009 Onuf was Harmsworth Professor of American History at the University of Oxford; in 2014, he was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 

 “We are absolutely delighted to have Peter’s vast knowledge and scholarship of America’s founding history on our Board as we build a museum of the future,” Christian Cotz, Chief Executive Officer said. “Peter’s expertise will help us expand our vision and fully share the importance of the First Amendment with our visitors.”

Onuf conducted extensive research on Thomas Jefferson’s political thought, culminating in Jefferson’s Empire: The Language of American Nationhood (University Press of Virginia, 2000). The Mind of Thomas Jefferson (2007, also Virginia), grows out of earlier studies on the history of American federalism, foreign policy, and political economy.  He and co-author Annette Gordon-Reed published Most Blessed of Patriarchs: Thomas Jefferson and the Empire of the Imagination (Liveright, 2016); his Jefferson and the Virginians: Democracy, Constitutions, and Empire was published in 2018 by Louisiana State University Press. With Ed Ayers and Brian Balogh, Onuf was also a founding co-host of the public radio program “Backstory with the American History Guys”. His early scholarship focused on federalism, territorial expansion, and 18th-century international relations. 

“We are at a crossroads in our country’s history and having a deeper understanding of our First Amendment freedoms is more important than ever,” Genie Gannett, President and Co-Founder said. “The First Amendment gives us the freedom to speak, publish our ideas, to practice religion, or not, and gives everyone a pathway to make the changes in our society that we want to see”.

Keep reading...

Guest blogpost about 9/11 written by Muslim American couple Afshan and Adam Paarlberg

Never forget.

On the 20th anniversary of September 11, 2001, we somberly reflect upon and honor the thousands of loved ones, law enforcement, first responders, and firefighters who lost their lives – many of whom were Muslim Americans. Many Americans nostalgically long for the days post 9/11 when our nation united as one, regardless of creed, race, or political affiliation. The strength of togetherness and solidarity carried us through the darkest days of our country’s history.

Unless you happened to be Muslim, brown, or Arab. As Muslims, we lament the moment that has come to define us in modern history. Many of us have struggled for acceptance and were made to feel unwelcome and un-American – victims of hate crimes, discrimination, and bullying. For example, Sikhs experienced the forcible removal of turbans, as did Muslim women with their hijabs. Many individuals have been on the wrong end of cries to “go back to your country.” In the aftermath of 9/11, the Patriot Act and NSEERS were born – laws and policies suggesting Muslim Americans had lesser rights, were not welcome, and need not apply. Muslim charities were also raided, and mosques surveilled. Fast forward to 2016, we heard our former President loudly proclaim that “Islam hates us,” words that many politicians and citizens alike have echoed.

It may then come as no surprise that we have experienced these sentiments in our professional settings. On more than one occasion, patients have told me [Adam] that they would never seek care from a Muslim doctor, unaware of my religious tradition when making such statements. My professional volunteer services were once refused by a charity on account of my faith. In a legal setting, my [Afshan] immigration clients from Muslim-majority countries almost always jump through extra security hoops. As Muslim Americans, as physician and lawyer, as parents, we daily grapple with navigating our identity. We understand that we are publicly judged first as Muslims, second as Americans. During heightened moments of Islamophobia, we even find ourselves second-guessing whether recreational activities such as camping or hiking are safe for us. We have never forgotten.

On the 20th anniversary of 9/11, we further lament a failed war on terror– a war which America promptly waged in our need for hasteful reckoning. A war that has displaced at least 37 million people in over eight countries and claimed nearly a million lives, most of whom were civilians. A war to which we have lost thousands of brave American men and women who gave their lives in service of their country, many more of whom are forever left wounded with physical and emotional trauma. Today, we grapple with the direct responsibility resulting from our actions and seek recompense as we help Afghan refugees make a new home in America.

As much as it pains us, we accept this as a part of our history and present. We also understand that today’s realities are connected to our nation’s past – from when enslaved Africans first arrived in America over 400 years ago to when Japanese Americans were confined to internment camps during WW2. We must never forget these histories if we are to learn from our mistakes and move forward as a more compassionate, intelligent, and united nation.

On this 20th anniversary of September 11, 2001, let us never forget.


Afshan Paarlberg is visiting faculty at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. She has a JD from the University of Houston Law Center and a BBA and BA from the University of Texas at Austin. She enjoys serving on several community boards, including Exodus Refugee Immigration and the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding. Afshan’s research and interest are focused on nonprofits, philanthropy, and forced migration.

Adam Paarlberg is a family physician and Associate Director of Franciscan Health Indianapolis Family Medicine Residency. He has a BA in Religious Studies from Wabash College and an MD from Indiana University School of Medicine. He enjoys a wide breadth of interests, including geriatrics, refugee and global health, addiction medicine, and bioethics.

Afshan and Adam have been married for 14 years and are parents to three lovely daughters.

The opinions stated in this blog are their own and do not reflect the views on any institutions with which they are affiliated, including the First Amendment Museum.

Keep reading...

Guest blogpost written by author and Muslim American Victor Begg.

Sept. 11, 2001 became the first day of a new calendar: two wars, the passage of the Patriot Act, new terror threats followed by Homeland Security alerts, rampant profiling, and FBI counterterrorism investigations. The result: American Muslims viewed as a suspect community—their constitutional rights violated with impunity in far too many cases.

That day, the world had changed before our eyes. We watched these attacks in real time. We could not stop watching the TV images. The staccato effect of the looped videos was a drumbeat of unthinkable carnage. People already were comparing this to Pearl Harbor.

Until that point, Muslims like me who came to America were quietly pursuing the American dream. I met my wife in graduate school, we started a business upon graduation, Citizenship, a suburban home and kids soon followed. America became home. I was able to give back to our community.

I was appointed to the Michigan Community Service Commission, elected to our local school board, cofounded a mosque, and became active in the Republican Party.

I was worried about backlash. Upon returning from high school, our hijabi daughter said to me, “People weren’t mean, but they had a lot of questions. Her brother, a senior at the same school where she was a junior, has a similar recollection of his feelings: “I was just shocked, but what these extremists did, it doesn’t cancel out the whole Muslim people”. Muslim Americans also died that day. Her older brother, a senior in college remembers, “At first, I didn’t believe a Muslim did it. Then, when they came out with the news that it was, I was pretty upset.”

“Oh, God, let it not be a Muslim!” That’s a new prayer Muslims have learned to pray any time headlines pop up about an explosion or mass shooting since the 1995 terrorist attack that blew up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 and injuring more than 680. That condemnable attack was the act of domestic terrorism but Muslims were hit with a tidal wave of hatred, media pundits jumped on the conclusion it was a Muslim who did it.

I was thankful when President Bush, at a mosque, firmly expressed the view: “These acts of violence against innocents violate fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And, it’s important for my fellow Americans to understand that”. He paraphrased the Quran’s basic principle, 30:10, condemning violence against innocents: “In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil.”      

I stepped up my activism, building interfaith coalitions, working with law enforcement for our security while protecting our rights, and promoting better relationships with neighbors, civic leaders and government agencies while standing up for my faith. With the outreach efforts: cultural and civic participation and working with civil rights groups the Muslim American community today has found its place in America—today we are clearly a part of the American scene. We have three Muslims in the Congress, multiple elected political and civic leaders across America. We have media presence and we’re an active part of our neighborhoods. The challenge today is to stay the course in a divided America. We’re no longer in a survival mode like then. Today, the threat to our freedoms is greater from homegrown terrorism.

After twenty years, the 9/11 anniversary is overshadowed by the Afghan tragedy. Many Americans, too young to remember that infamous day, sacrificed their lives in the wars that followed, along with an untold number of innocent Iraqi, Syrian and Afghan civilian victims.

A crisis like the one in Afghanistan today focuses on the accompanying stereotypical images. With the Taliban in the news, Muslims are concerned once again about reporting that magnifies Islamophobia. Terms like Sharia law, Islamic fundamentalism, treatment of women by Muslims are finding their way into media outlets. Thankfully, we have our First Amendment Rights that allow Muslims to speak up and defend misinformation. Or, as a writer, I have the privilege to offer an opinion editorial to counter with the truth.

Even as we faced challenges, a Pew Research Center report finds that four in five Muslim Americans say they’re concerned but satisfied with the way things are going in their lives, and nine in ten say they are proud to be American and are contributing members of the society.


Victor Begg is the author of the 2019 memoir “Our Muslim Neighbors—Achieving the American Dream; An Immigrant’s Memoir.” Learn more about Victor and his work at www.victorbegg.com.

The opinions stated in this blog are Victor’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the First Amendment Museum.

Keep reading...

Guest blogpost about 9/11 written by Muslim American Hiba Alami

I have three children. One thing I share with them is not a presence on Tik Tok, but the post 9/11 world. As a Muslim immigrant who arrived to the U.S. six months after 9/11, my experience was largely shaped by that terrorist attack and the way Muslims were perceived after that.

I don’t wear a headscarf. My fair complexion and blue eyes help me pass as a white American. This “white privilege” catches people off guard when they hear my accent. Suddenly, I’m the “Other.” Some people make a guess about my “origin” and others look perplexed, trying to piece together my identity and background. However, once I share that I come from a Muslim majority country and I work for a Muslim nonprofit, I leave very little to their imagination, and give them reasons to discriminate against me.

At a tender age, my children started questioning their place in the world and what it means to grow up as a Muslim in America. Although microaggressive comments and blatant bigotry continue to smear their adolescence, they remain loud and proud of their religious and cultural identity. They stand tall in the knowledge that their immigrant Muslim household brings them unique perspective and cultural wealth. They find themselves surviving in an exclusive ecosystem with fellow Muslim Americans, facing the same challenges and seeking similar opportunities.

 In the last two decades, no matter where Muslim Americans lived or looked like, they felt alienated and persecuted. From the Bush-era Muslim immigrant registry to the Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban, such discriminatory policies implemented by the U.S. government exploited public fear to profile and spy on innocent people. It fueled Islamophobia, and incited a steady spike in hate crimes against Muslims. Over the past decade, half of Muslim Americans say they find it harder to be Muslim. In 2021, half of Muslim families in the U.S. report religion-based bullying, twice as likely as the general public.

Discriminatory policies should be rewritten to protect all Americans, no exceptions. To that end, countless Muslim organizations were formed over the last two decades to advocate for the equity, safety, and justice for all communities on the local and national levels. Muslim Americans increased their civic and political participation and rose to positions of power and influence on Capitol Hill, state capitols, the media and the big screen. In 2018 and 2020 elections, the number of Muslim Americans who ran for office was at all-time high and Muslim voters exercised their civic duty in record numbers. They continue to donate to charitable causes within their faith communities, and support domestic poverty alleviation efforts outside of their communities. They come from all walks of life, heavily contribute to the economy, and strive everyday to be perceived as an integral part of the social fabric.

The COVID-19 pandemic swept the world and brought unprecedented public health and economic challenges to all Americans. Nonetheless, Muslim Americans rolled their sleeves and stepped up to the challenge. Their response was overwhelmingly positive, marked by the hundreds of thousands of Muslim American heath care providers who were at the frontlines, risking their lives to save others. In New York City, one of the first COVID epicenters,  9% of medical doctors are Muslims, providing healthcare to more than 5 million patients. Since March 15, 2020, 631 acts of service were logged by Muslim communities across the nation to meet the pressing needs for food and economic security, mental health, safety equipment, and spiritual support, just to name a few.

As the nation commemorates the 20th anniversary of 9/11, we witness the patriotism of Muslim Americans being questioned time and again. But what does it mean to be American? Do all Americans need to look alike and worship the same way? And what makes some of them patriots and others not?


Hiba Alalami

Hiba Alami is the Executive Director of the Indiana Muslim Advocacy Network. She is a mother, wife and an active Muslim community member in Central Indiana.

The opinions stated in this blog are Hiba’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the First Amendment Museum.

Keep reading...

First Amendment Museum Receives a $249,000 Grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services

A rendering of the design for the completed First Amendment Museum in Augusta.

The First Amendment Museum (FAM) was awarded a highly competitive Museums for America grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services in the amount of $249,000 to “Complete the Permanent Exhibition Design for the First Amendment Museum.” The FAM is a new non-partisan museum focused on educating and inspiring individuals to exercise their First Amendment rights: religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. 

“The FAM is thrilled to receive this federal grant which will move our project forward in important ways,” said Christian Cotz, CEO. “The museum’s exhibitions will demonstrate how Americans have utilized their First Amendment rights as a tool to advance our society and to create that ‘more perfect union’ that is our civic charge. But perhaps more importantly, these dynamic, thought-provoking, and interactive exhibitions will inspire people to live their freedoms and exercise their rights in more intentional and effective ways.”

The First Amendment Museum has embarked on a sitewide restoration project to transform the historic Guy P. Gannett house, located next to the Maine State Capitol and Governor’s Mansion, into a 21st-century museum. The exhibition will be created by celebrated designer Helen Reigle of HER Design in Boston, whose portfolio includes the Boston Public Library’s Dear Boston: Messages from the Marathon Memorial, the National Baseball Hall of Fame’s A Whole New Game, and America on The Move at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History.

“This major grant will help us create a visitor experience that is unique, interactive, and relevant,” said Genie Gannett, Co-founder and President of the Board of Directors. “We’re tremendously grateful to the IMLS for their generous support of this effort.” 

The state-of-the-art exhibition will allow visitors to encounter, interact with, and reflect upon their rights by reinforcing the notion that we utilize and engage with our First Amendment freedoms daily, often inside our own homes. Incorporating best practices for exhibition design, each room of the museum will interpret a particular aspect of the First Amendment. For example, a dystopian kitchen will show what life would be like in a society without the First Amendment; the Library of Censorship will highlight books, movies, and music that have been banned throughout the years; a teen bedroom will explore youth speech and social media; and the exercise room will engage kinesthetic learners. 

A dystopian kitchen will show what life would be like in a society without the First Amendment.

The completion of this exhibition will contribute to visitors’ understanding of their First Amendment rights and inspire them to practice and preserve the five freedoms of the First Amendment.

“We are in the beginning stages of this campaign to build an inspiring new museum here in Maine,” said Jamie O’Brien, Chief Development Officer. “The IMLS Grant is an important step, and we hope others will join us in this non-partisan project to inspire and educate on the importance of utilizing our First Amendment rights for the betterment of our society and our country.” 


About the First Amendment Museum

The First Amendment is the cornerstone of democracy; when Americans value our freedoms, democracy thrives. The First Amendment Museum is a non-partisan museum that inspires us to “Live Our Freedoms” by understanding and using our First Amendment rights to advance democracy so that all reap the benefits. Visitors can explore the Museum located in the historic capitol district of Augusta on free guided tours of the temporary exhibition spaces – available from 10 am – 4 pm, Monday through Friday, and on Saturdays until September 4th.

To stay up to date on the latest museum news, sign up for our e-newsletter.

Keep reading...

In this inaugural role, O’Brien will oversee the Museum’s development efforts 

The First Amendment Museum (FAM) has appointed Jamie O’Brien as Chief Development Officer effective July 19, 2021. In this inaugural role, O’Brien will oversee development efforts to support a new concept museum that will inspire people to understand and exercise their First Amendment rights. The museum is located in Augusta, Me. in the former home of media titan, Guy P. Gannett, and was founded by his granddaughters, Genie Gannett and Terry Gannett Hopkins.

O’Brien joins FAM from the Colby College Museum of Art where she served as Museum Development Officer and Interim Director of Museum Development.  Her efforts there resulted in record-breaking museum annual fund giving and major gifts towards Colby’s Dare Northward Campaign. Previously, O’Brien was the inaugural Manager of Development and Marketing at Ogunquit Museum of American Art where she also achieved significant growth in the museum’s annual fund and major gifts. O’Brien brings 20 years of other relevant experience to her new role, having formerly worked as a journalist early in her career at Time, Inc.’s Entertainment Weekly in New York, as Editor-in-Chief of Where Magazine, Boston, and as the founding Director of Content for AltaVista Entertainment in Boston. O’Brien received a BS in Journalism and Speech Communications from Ball State University. 

“Jamie’s record of success in development and journalism will help us grow the FAM in important ways in the next decade,” Christian Cotz, Chief Executive Officer said. “We are building a team of excellence, and Jamie brings well-honed skills and strategic leadership to our staff.”

The FAM has embarked on an ambitious path to renovate and expand the historic house into a 21st-century museum. “The promise of growing a new institution at a pivotal time in our nation’s history is an exciting and important opportunity,” O’Brien said. “The museum will not only benefit the people of Maine but the country at large.”

In a recent survey, 30% of adults interviewed could not name any of their First Amendment rights. “We are at a crossroads in our country’s history and having a deeper understanding of our First Amendment freedoms is more important than ever,” Genie Gannett, President and Co-Founder said. “The First Amendment gives us the freedom to speak, publish our ideas, to practice religion, or not, and gives everyone a pathway to make the changes in our society that we want to see”.

A century ago, Guy P. Gannett merged two newspapers to create the Portland Press Herald and within a few years, purchased several more Maine newspapers and established Guy Gannett Publishing Co, which later became Guy Gannett Communications. In the following decades, the company diversified into both radio and television.  By the 1950s,  the company owned the Evening Express, the Waterville Morning Sentinel, Portland Sunday Telegram, the Kennebec Journal,  WGAN radio, and WGAN-TV (now WGME). As a publisher, Guy Gannett was a champion of the free press, and his former home, next door to the Governor’s mansion and the State Capital, is a perfect location for an inspirational civic organization.     

About the First Amendment Museum

The First Amendment is the cornerstone of democracy.  When Americans value our freedoms, democracy thrives. The First Amendment Museum is a non-partisan museum that inspires us to “Live Our Freedoms” by understanding and using our First Amendment rights to advance democracy so that all reap the benefits.

The museum envisions a nation of individuals who are informed, active, and engaged in their commitment to uphold the freedoms protected by the First Amendment, inspired to live their freedoms in their everyday lives, and respectful of others’ right to do so.

First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Keep reading...

Article written by Maureen Milliken and was originally published in Mainebiz on July 12, 2021.

The tattered paper banner reads “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” in crudely rendered black letters, and it’s one of the more recent artifacts on display at Augusta’s developing First Amendment Museum.

The banner may not seem like a museum piece, but it’s an illustration of the museum’s vision, one that’s fueling a soon-to-be-launched $14 million capital campaign.

“For a long time, museums really shied away from the present tense,” says Christian Cotz, executive director. But the museum planned in Augusta will “show how history matters in real life.”

The museum is at 184 State St., next door to the governor’s residence and in the shadow of the Statehouse, a prime location for school groups and local visitors. But those involved in its development have a much bigger scope in mind.

That scope is already growing with online presentations that relate current events to First Amendment freedoms, and have been attended by people from around the world.

“We’ll start in Maine, but it’s a national effort,” Cotz says. “Give us 10 years.”

No dusty artifacts under glass

The project is catching momentum at a time when the perception of what makes a museum is evolving, and during an elevated national discussion about what makes a democracy.

The museum won’t be “dusty artifacts under glass,” but an interactive experience that will help visitors relate the First Amendment to their lives, Cotz says.

The banner that reads “Bong Hits 4 Jesus,” which the museum is raising $2,500 to preserve, is an example of that. It was created by Alaska high school student Joseph Frederick, who displayed it at an Olympic torch relay event in 2002. He wanted to see “if the First Amendment still exists in this town.” The principal, Deborah Morse, wasn’t amused and Frederick was suspended.

The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in Morse v. Frederick that schools can restrict student speech when it can be perceived as promoting illegal drug use. The case is similar to one the court ruled on in June, finding a cheerleader shouldn’t have been punished by her school for an F-bomb-fueled Snapchat rant, since it was off-campus expression.

The cases are among a handful that define the limits of student free speech. Cotz says the museum plans to use examples like those to make the First Amendment relevant.

“We want people to ask, ‘How does the First Amendment affect my life?’” he says.

A big part of that is helping people understand what the First Amendment is. A 2019 Freedom Institute survey found 71% of Americans can name one of the amendment’s five freedoms, with the majority knowing “freedom of speech.” Only 1% can name all five — speech, religion, press, assembly and to petition the government on grievances. And only 4% can name four.

The museum is apolitical, looking to empower people through knowledge.

“One of the things we hope to do in the exhibits is have people ask, ‘What if we didn’t have this freedom in America? What would it look like?’” says Genie Gannett, a cofounder with her sister, Terry Gannett Hopkins.

The underpinnings of a museum that will do just that is taking shape, but it’s been a slow process.

Local partners, strong team

Plans were first approved by the Augusta Planning Board in November 2018. Since then, extensive work has been done to the house to get in in shape to begin renovations.

In the past year, things have taken shape, with the capital campaign kicking off a soft launch with a $150,000 gift from Kennebec Savings Bank in November.

A rendering of the design for the completed First Amendment Museum in Augusta. An addition will double its size.

“I genuinely believe that the First Amendment Museum will help people of all ages know and understand their First Amendment rights,” says Andrew Silsby, president of Kennebec Savings. “It will also help our city grow economically and culturally. The museum will draw more tourists to Augusta and will be a community hub that will be a great source of pride for the citizens of central Maine.”

Cotz and Gannett say that partnerships, both locally and farther afield, are part of the museum’s game plan.

There’s no firm timeline to launch the capital campaign. For now, the campaign is being promoted by a video on the museum’s website. In March, the board agreed to create an endowment. The museum has also hired a chief development officer, Jamie O’Brien.

“She will be instrumental in helping us with the campaign,” said Deborah Williams, Manager of Outreach Engagement.

Local support is abundant. Besides Kennebec Savings, the museum has received support from law firm Preti Flaherty, which has offices a block north. Ganneston Construction, of Augusta, the general contractor on the addition, has been providing pro bono consulting.

The team has taken shape, too. Cotz became executive director in January 2020.

The museum hired an exhibit designer and project manager, Helen Riegle of HER Design in Boston. She’s done work for the Smithsonian and the National Baseball Hall of Fame. Amanda Austin, of 2A Architects, of Rockport, leads the expansion design.

Old building challenges

Prior to joining the museum, Cotz held senior leadership positions at Montpelier, the historic Virginia estate of James and Dolley Madison, which underwent a major restoration during his tenure. So it’s not his first crack at bringing an old building up to modern standards. There’s also the fact that Madison, America’s fourth president, was considered the “father of the Constitution.”

“There are a lot of parallels between the two places,” says Cotz, who spent two decades at Montpelier.

The Augusta museum’s stucco-exterior Mediterranean Revival-style building long called the Gannett House was considered a modern marvel when it was built in 1911, with electricity, a central vacuum system, and the city’s first car garage.

As Cotz and Gannett talk in what was once her grandparents’ sitting room, the lack of air-conditioning on a warm day underlines the challenges.

“It’s a big house, but there are no big spaces that you need for a museum,” Cotz says.

In the past five years, the building has undergone extensive interior and exterior work, including new windows and roof. It still needs new bathrooms, handicap accessibility, an elevator, an HVAC system.

While preliminary work on the addition gets going, the house will be further restored. Eventually it will have exhibits on how the First Amendment looks at home, with a library featuring books that have faced censorship. A teen room will help visitors “navigate the murky world of free expression on the internet,” including a multimedia interactive game that challenges visitors to spot moments when public discourse becomes uncivil.

The museum is working with the Maine Preservation Commission and the Capitol Planning Commission, which oversees the master plan for the state government campus, a stipulation when the nonprofit that owns it bought the building from the state.

For the public good

When William Gannett built the house as a wedding gift for his son, Guy, the proximity to the heart of state government was intentional.

“He wanted it to be close to the Capitol, to the governor,” Gannett, who is Guy Gannett’s granddaughter, says. The publishing family founded some of the country’s biggest magazines in the late-19th century, owned several Maine newspapers, and eventually TV and radio stations. Guy Gannett didn’t see the newspapers as a private enterprise.

“He felt what they were doing was for the public good,” she says.

Cotz says the location will still be a key piece.

“We’re within an hour of 100,000 schoolchildren,” he says.

The combination of Maine State Museum and Archives, on the other side of the Statehouse, as well as the Capitol building itself, make an exciting one-two-three punch. Cotz envisions field trips in which students visit the state museum, then visit the State House, then move on to the First Amendment Museum, to learn what part they play in it all.

For now, visitors can tour it for free, and check out panels that show what’s coming.

Cotz and Gannett say they realize that the $14 million price tag seems high — but also note it’s the same goal the Children’s Museum & Theatre of Maine set for its new building, which opened June 24.

The cause is vital, Gannett says. “As a country, we need to pay attention to the First Amendment and what it means. [The museum] plays an important role.”

Cotz says museums that are truly embracing their purpose understand their place in history. “Any museum that opens now has to take the last few years into account,” he says.

That is true, in particular, for the one they are building in Augusta.

Cotz says understanding democracy means understanding the First Amendment. “It’s the way we change our government, it’s the way we change our society, it’s the way we change our world,” he says. “If the goal is ‘to form a more perfect union,’ we have to commit, not only to talking about what the First Amendment is, but how it affects how we think, govern — how it’s put into action.”

Cotz knows that’s a big calling for a museum in Augusta, Maine. “But we can do it. We’re here to do it.”

Fireplace photo
The Gannett family, in the living room of what’s now the First Amendment Museum, in 1922. From left, Guy P. Gannett, daughter Alice Madeleine, son John, wife Anne Macomber Gannett.

William Gannett, whose Comfort Magazine, published in Augusta in the late 1800s, was the first magazine to reach 1 million subscribers, built the house that is home to the First Amendment Museum for his son, Guy, as a wedding gift in 2011.

Guy, in 1921, bought Portland’s two daily newspapers (now the Press Herald), as well as the Kennebec Journal and Waterville Sentinel. He sold the house in 1927, moving to Cape Elizabeth.

Genie Gannett, Guy’s granddaughter, says the museum fulfills a wish from her mother, who lived in the house as a child. When Genie herself was a child, they lived in Augusta. “Every time we’d drive by, my mother would say, ‘Oh, I wish they’d do something with the house.’”

Gannett and her sister, Terry Hopkins, began the process of buying it from the state in 2010 through a nonprofit funded by their mother. They at first planned to make it a museum that recounted the Gannett publishing and journalism history.

“But we saw it had to be more,” she says. The idea evolved into a museum that championed newspapers and the free press, then the First Amendment as a whole. “It’s a package deal,” she says.

More than a century after her great-grandfather built the house, intentionally close to state government in order to “keep an eye on it,” she says, “I feel in a lot of ways we’re fulfilling a legacy.”

Learn more about our future plans. Sign up for our e-newsletter to stay up to date with what’s going on at the First Amendment Museum.

Keep reading...

May 15 @ 10:03 am

July 4th Event

We are hosting a free Open House on July 4 from 1 – 5 pm that will include family-friendly crafts, games, tours, and food.

We are right along the parade route for the Augusta Parade – so come, have fun, and get your spot for the parade!

All are welcome – come celebrate the Fourth of July with the First Amendment Museum!

Keep reading...

Apple Daily was a pro-democracy newspaper

Guest blog post by Gene Policinski

The newspaper Apple Daily, a fixture and voice for democracy in Hong Kong for decades, closes this Saturday, days after China arrested its owner and its top editors and froze its financial assets.

Source: BBC

The fate of one newspaper, halfway around the world, may not have grabbed your attention before. But the shutdown is worthy of some thought by us all, as a significant marker in the effort by Beijing to extinguish this beacon of democracy in the world’s most populous nation.

Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai was jailed some months ago on phony charges regarding a real estate lease, and Lai and op editors and news executives of Apple Daily now face vague charges related to “national security” – with life sentences a possibility.

The final move to silence Lai and his newspaper, frequent critics of the anti-democratic policies of the mainland government, was to freeze more than $2 million in assets of companies connected to the Hong Kong newspaper – rendering it unable to pay staff or bills.

Jimmy Lai, Source: Getty Images

In 1997, when Great Britain ended its colonial control of the city, Chinese leaders promised Hong Kong residents that they would continue to have what we in the United States would call First Amendment freedoms for at least 50 years.

Source: HKFP

No more. Hundreds of arrests, police brutality toward pro-freedom protesters and severe financial moves like those against Apple Daily are proof that China no longer honors that promise – or respects democracy.

Lai is a self-made millionaire and publisher who choose to remain in Hong Kong to be a vocal critic of China’s repressive moves. As a close associate told me some weeks ago, “he has homes around the world. He chose to stay and to speak out. He knew the risks.”

Lai has been honored for his courage and voice by First Amendment groups like the Freedom Forum, who awarded him its 2021 Free Expression Award last April – just one day before he was found guilty of supporting “illegal assemblies.” And yesterday in Paris, the press freedom group Reporters Without Borders staged a mock funeral, complete with casket, outside the Chinese embassy to denounce the forced closing of Apple Daily.

While the jailings and closings are worthy of concern on their own, we also need to recognize that despotic regimes world-wide are watching the international response to China’s action. Protest may not free Jimmy Lai and his colleagues or bring back Apple Daily. But silence in the face of repression will speak loudly to those who aim to quiet dissent anywhere in the world – including the U.S.

Source: RSJ

In our own nation, a free press needs support for multiple reasons – financial stress as advertising mainly has moved from broadcast and print outlets to social media and other online operations; a loss of confidence from sizeable portions of the public; and aggressive moves by politicians who would like nothing more than eliminate the “watchdog on government” that might hold them accountable to voters.

A public stand for Apply Daily and Jimmy Lai could help in Hong Kong – and will be a vocal show of support for basic freedoms of conscience and free speech worldwide. Anyone who advocates for First Amendment freedoms as a cornerstone of democracy, here and elsewhere, should make that support known however they can.

Memo to China: Unfreeze Apple Daily’s assets and stop arresting and harassing its staff. Abide by your promises of freedom for the citizens of Hong Kong. Release Jimmy Lai.


Gene Policinski is a member of the board of trustees and board secretary of the First Amendment Museum and frequently writes on issues involving the First Amendment.

Keep reading...